Some cases stay with you.
Not because they were dramatic in the operating theatre.
But because of what they meant to the person lying on that table.
This was a 34-year-old woman. Young. Hopeful. Already carrying the quiet grief of an inevitable abortion at 15 weeks. There had been bleeding. There had been fear. And there had been that heavy silence that follows loss.
When she walked in, she wasn’t just looking for treatment.
She was looking for reassurance that her uterus — and her chance at motherhood — could still be protected.
That changes how you think about uterine fibroids treatment. It’s not just about removing disease. It’s about preserving possibility.
The Backstory: What We Were Dealing With
Her obstetric history read: A1 — inevitable abortion at 15 weeks.
LMP was 23rd November 2025. No major systemic illnesses. On paper, fairly straightforward.
But scans rarely lie.
The HSG showed bilateral patent fallopian tubes. That was a small relief. The tubes were open. Fertility still had a pathway.
Then came the MRI pelvis.
And that’s when things became layered.
- A large focal adenomyoma in the posterior wall of the uterus
- A calcified lesion in the left ovary
- Tiny haemorrhagic cysts and a small endometriotic cyst in the right ovary
Sonography added more details:
- 2.2 cm anterior wall subserosal fibroid
- 3.3 cm posterior adenomyotic nodule
- 3.3 cm right ovarian endometrioma
- 3.7 cm left dermoid cyst
- Normal endometrium on 3D scan
Multiple uterine fibroids. Adenomyosis. Ovarian cysts on both sides.
Not a simple picture.
And definitely not something you brush off with “let’s wait and watch.”
The Diagnosis
Clear and direct:
- Multiple uterine fibroids
- Adenomyosis of the uterus
- Left ovarian dermoid cyst
- Right ovarian endometrioma
Now here’s the tricky part.
When fibroids and adenomyosis coexist, symptoms overlap. Pain. Heavy bleeding. Pelvic pressure. Sometimes infertility.
And adenomyosis, especially when focal and deep in the posterior wall, can be stubborn.
So the question wasn’t just what to treat.
It was how to treat it without compromising fertility.
Why Surgery Was Needed
There were several reasons we couldn’t delay:
- Multiple fibroids with adenomyosis
- Bilateral ovarian cysts
- Adhesions already forming
- Desire to preserve fertility
- Strong preference to avoid hysterectomy
When a 34-year-old says, “I want to keep my uterus,” you listen carefully.
Because technically, yes — removing the uterus would solve adenomyosis permanently.
But that wasn’t her solution.
She needed something smarter. Targeted. Conservative. Effective.
Inside the Operating Theatre
Sometimes imaging gives you half the story. Surgery shows you the rest.
Intraoperatively, we found:
- A 4 × 6.6 cm focal adenomyoma in the posterior uterine wall
- A 2 × 2 cm subserosal fibroid on the anterior/lateral surface
- Left ovary with a solid fibroma
- Right ovary with a classic chocolate cyst (endometrioma)
- Right ovary and tube adherent to the pelvic side wall
- Omentum adherent to the posterior uterus
- Rectum adherent to the posterior uterine wall
Adhesions tell a story of chronic inflammation. Of pain that probably had been brewing longer than she realized.
At this point, surgical planning becomes dynamic. You don’t just “remove things.” You strategize.
The Procedure: Combining Precision and Preservation
We performed:
- Laparoscopic bilateral cystectomy
- Myomectomy (fibroid removal)
- Sonography-guided microwave ablation procedure for adenomyosis
Let’s pause here.
Microwave ablation uterus treatment isn’t yet something every patient has heard about. And honestly, even some doctors are still warming up to it.
But in selected cases, it makes deep sense.
Why Use Microwave Ablation for Adenomyosis?
Adenomyosis isn’t always neatly removable like a fibroid. It infiltrates the muscle layer of the uterus. If you try to excise too aggressively, you risk weakening the uterine wall.
And for someone who wants a pregnancy later? That matters.
Microwave ablation works differently.
It delivers controlled thermal energy directly into the adenomyotic tissue. The abnormal tissue is destroyed from within, while the surrounding healthy uterus is preserved.
In this case, it offered several advantages:
- Targeted destruction of adenomyosis
- Uterus preservation
- Minimal blood loss
- Reduced surgical trauma
- Faster recovery
- Better fertility preservation potential
No, it’s not magic.
But it’s thoughtful medicine.
And when you’re aiming for the best treatment for fibroids combined with adenomyosis, sometimes combining techniques gives better outcomes than choosing just one.
What About the Ovaries?
Both ovarian cysts were addressed laparoscopically.
The left dermoid cyst was removed.
The right endometrioma was excised carefully, preserving ovarian tissue as much as possible.
Ovarian reserve matters. Especially at 34.
This wasn’t just about ovarian fibroids treatment or cyst removal. It was about protecting future egg potential.
Subtle difference. Big impact.
The Outcome
Surgery went smoothly.
Fibroids removed.
Cysts cleared.
Adenomyosis treated using microwave ablation.
Uterus preserved.
Postoperatively, she was stable.
But what I remember most isn’t the operative success.
It’s the relief in her eyes when she understood that her uterus was intact.
That her story wasn’t ending here.
Where This Fits in Modern Uterine Fibroids Surgery
Traditionally, women with multiple uterine fibroids and adenomyosis were often pushed toward hysterectomy — especially if symptoms were significant.
But times are changing.
Today, uterine fibroids surgery is more nuanced.
We individualize.
We combine myomectomy with energy-based treatments.
We use imaging guidance intraoperatively.
We respect reproductive goals.
Microwave ablation of the uterus isn’t for everyone. Case selection matters. Depth of lesion matters. Future pregnancy plans matter.
But in carefully chosen patients, it can shift the entire conversation from “removal” to “preservation.”
And that’s powerful.
A Thought That Stays With Me
When women come with fibroids, adenomyosis, or chronic pelvic pain, they often say the same thing:
“I just want my body to feel normal again.”
Not pain-free forever. Not perfect.
Just normal.
This case was about restoring normalcy. Removing what didn’t belong. Preserving what did.
There’s something deeply satisfying about that balance.
Conclusion
If you’re navigating multiple uterine fibroids, complex ovarian cysts, or wondering about fertility-preserving options, it’s important to consult someone experienced in advanced laparoscopic care and energy-based therapies.
If you’re looking for a Gynaec Laparoscopic Surgeon in Ahmedabad, individualized surgical planning makes all the difference — especially when microwave ablation is being considered.
Because sometimes the goal isn’t just removing disease.
It’s protecting a future that hasn’t happened yet.